Types of Access Control Models and Methods – A Complete Guide

What is Access Control

Access control is something we encounter more often than we realize. Whether it’s swiping a keycard to enter your office or entering a password to access a work system, access control helps organizations regulate who gets in, and who stays out. It’s not just about security either; it’s about managing resources efficiently. Access control methods help organizations prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data and ensure compliance with industry standards.

Now, access control doesn’t work on a “one size fits all” approach. The model you choose can depend on various factors, including the type of data, the level of security needed, and the specific needs of your organization. But before we break down the different types of access control models, let’s take a moment to consider why these controls are so important in both physical and digital spaces.

1. Discretionary Access Control (DAC)

Discretionary Access Control (DAC) grants control to the resource owner. Suppose you have a document on your computer and you control who can see or edit it; this shows the DAC in action. You, as the owner, determine who has access and what they may do with it. What’s the benefit? It’s versatile. You have full control over your resources. However, there is downside to it as well, i.e., It is primarily reliant on human judgment, and errors can occur.

For example, you could unintentionally grant access to someone who should not have it, or a well-meaning coworker could share access with the incorrect individual. So, while DAC is simple to build, it’s best suited for contexts where data security isn’t crucial or where you trust users to handle access responsibly.

2. Mandatory Access Control (MAC)

With Mandatory Access Control (MAC), the system takes control. Individual users do not have control over access decisions; instead, a central authority enforces them based on predetermined rules. You have no control over who sees the files; instead, you must follow the system’s regulations. MAC is widely employed in high-security contexts, such as military or government entities. There are various methods for implementing

For example, consider top-secret documents. They are only accessible to individuals with the appropriate security clearance, and the user has no control over these decisions. Although MAC is very secure, it is not the most flexible solution because it requires strict data and role classification, which can be difficult in dynamic contexts.

The complete guide to zero trust for government bodies.This whitepaper provides a comprehensive guide to Zero Trust security for government bodies.
Download Whitepaper

3. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) is a more organized method, allocating access based on a user’s role inside the company. Rather of granting everyone individual permissions, the system gives privileges based on the responsibilities of a given function. This strategy is especially beneficial in large firms where managing individual permissions for each person would be inefficient.

Consider RBAC to be similar to a university, with varying levels of access for professors, students, and administrative staff. Professors can grade assignments and use research databases, but students can only browse course materials. The beauty of RBAC is its scalability; when a new person joins, you just assign them the appropriate role, and they are instantly granted the necessary permissions.

4. Rule-Based Access Control

Rule-Based Access Control is based on a set of predefined rules. These rules can be configured based on specific criteria such as time of day, location, or network traffic. It’s similar to RBAC, but more adaptable to changing situations.

For example, a company may have a regulation that bans access to the server room after work hours. Even if an individual has the appropriate role, the rule may block access at certain times to increase security.

5. Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC)

Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) is a very flexible and complex paradigm that bases access decisions on a combination of user, resource, and environmental variables. Attributes may include the user’s role, the time of access, the location of the device, and even the sensitivity of the data being accessed.

ABAC uses complicated policy rules to give or prohibit access. This technique works particularly well in dynamic contexts where security requirements change depending on the context of access. For example, an ABAC system may let a doctor to access a patient’s medical information when in the hospital, but prohibit access if they attempt to log in from an insecure home network.

While access control models such as RBAC and ABAC are commonly linked with digital systems, they also apply to physical environments. Physical access control refers to the systems and procedures that limit access to buildings, rooms, and other physical spaces. This can include simple devices like lock-and-key mechanisms or more sophisticated technology like biometric scanners.

The fundamental purpose of physical access control is to prevent unauthorized personnel from entering secure locations. For example, a corporation may demand employees to swipe a badge or use a keycard to access their office building. Biometric access control (e.g., fingerprint or retina scanning) is used to improve security in highly sensitive areas, such as data centres or research laboratories.

There are various methods for implementing physical access control. Some of the most common types include:

1. Keycards and Badges

Keycards and badges are among the most used forms of physical access control in businesses. These devices carry encoded information that allows or restricts access to specific regions. When a user scans their card at a reader, the system validates their credentials and decides whether to grant access. Keycards are widely used in offices, hospitals, and institutions.

2. Biometric Access Control

Biometric systems validate a person’s identify by analyzing unique physical traits such as fingerprints, facial recognition, or iris scans. Because these characteristics are nearly impossible to reproduce, biometric access control offers greater security than standard keycards or passwords. Biometric systems are frequently employed in high-security environments, such as government buildings and research institutes.

3. Mobile Access Control

With the introduction of smartphones, mobile access control has become a viable alternative to keycards and badges. Employees can use their mobile devices to open doors using Bluetooth or NFC (Near Field Communication). Mobile access solutions are especially beneficial for temporary or remote workers because access credentials may be readily distributed and revoked.

4. Security Guards and Manual Systems

Though technology has transformed physical access control, human intervention remains an essential component in some cases. Security personnel are frequently stationed at access points to verify identification, check credentials, and monitor visitor behavior. They provide an extra layer of safety, particularly in places where automated systems may not be sufficient.

The difference between logical and physical access control is in what they protect. Physical access control is concerned with protecting tangible assets including buildings, rooms, and machinery. In contrast, logical access control is concerned with the security of digital systems, applications, and data.

For example, an employee may be required to use a keycard to get entry to a company’s physical premises. Once entered, they may log into the company’s network with a login, password, and multi-factor authentication (logical access control). Both methods of access control combine to form a complete security strategy that protects both physical and digital assets.